ADA Website Lawsuits Up 27% in 2025: Why 2026 Will Be Worse

Seyfarth Shaw, which tracks ADA Title III litigation, counted 3,117 federal court website accessibility lawsuits in 2025, against 2,452 in 2024, which it reports as "a 27% increase from 2024" (Seyfarth Shaw, ADA Title III blog, 25 March 2026).

That spike wiped out two years of decline. The dip in 2023 and 2024 that made some business owners relax? Gone. We're right back to peak lawsuit territory.

Consumer-facing sites take most of it. EcomBack, counting 3,948 ADA website accessibility lawsuits filed in 2025, reports that "the top 9 industries accounted for 3,613 lawsuits (91.51%)", led by restaurant, food and drink at 1,368 (34.65%) and lifestyle, fashion and apparel at 1,025 (25.96%) (EcomBack, 2025 annual report). EcomBack and Seyfarth count different universes, which is why the two totals differ.

But here's what should really concern you. Several forces are converging right now that will push these numbers even higher in 2026.

AI is making it ridiculously easy to sue

This is the biggest shift nobody's talking about enough.

Plaintiffs filing without a lawyer are the clearest signal. Seyfarth reported in October 2025 that pro se plaintiffs filed 1,774 federal ADA Title III lawsuits in all of 2024, against 1,867 in the first nine months of 2025 alone, which on a monthly average is a 40% increase (Seyfarth Shaw, October 2025). Note what that figure is and is not: it is the growth in pro se filings, not the share of all filings.

Someone with a disability visits your website, can't use it, and now they can generate a legal complaint in minutes. No $5,000 legal retainer. No attorney consultations. Just a prompt and a filing fee.

Some courts have started pushing back. One federal judge banned AI use in court filings entirely. Others have sanctioned pro se litigants for submitting briefs with fabricated case citations. But the trend line is clear - the barrier to filing a lawsuit has dropped to nearly zero.

And it's not just individuals. Plaintiff's law firms are using AI to scan hundreds of websites at once, flagging accessibility violations automatically, then filing batches of complaints. New firms are entering the space specifically because AI makes the whole operation cheaper to run.

The European Accessibility Act is now being enforced

If you sell to customers in the EU, you have a second legal front to worry about.

The European Accessibility Act (EAA) took effect on June 28, 2025. This isn't a recommendation or a guideline. It's law across all 27 EU member states, and enforcement started immediately.

Within days of the deadline, French disability advocacy groups sent formal legal notices to four major grocery retailers. When those retailers didn't fix their websites fast enough, emergency injunctions were filed in November 2025. Sweden started market surveillance of e-commerce sites in October. Denmark began contacting businesses about compliance. The Netherlands is running audits.

The penalties vary by country but they're all painful. Up to €100,000 per violation in Germany and Italy. In France, up to €75,000 or 4% of annual revenue. And this applies to any business selling to EU customers - regardless of where that business is based. If you're in the US, UK, or anywhere else and you have EU customers, the EAA applies to you.

Here's the part most businesses miss: unlike the ADA, which has no formal web standard written into the law, the EAA explicitly requires WCAG compliance. There's less room for interpretation. Either your site meets the standard or it doesn't.

The Title II deadline moved to 2027, and it changes less than it sounds

The ADA Title II web rule adopted in April 2024 originally required public entities with a population of 50,000 or more to comply by 24 April 2026. That date has moved. On 20 April 2026 the Department of Justice published an Interim Final Rule, effective the same day, titled "Extension of Compliance Dates for Nondiscrimination on the Basis of Disability; Accessibility of Web Information and Services of State and Local Government Entities". In its own words, "The compliance date for State and local government entities with a total population of 50,000 or more is extended from April 24, 2026, to April 26, 2027. The compliance date for public entities with a total population of less than 50,000, or any special district government, is extended from April 26, 2027, to April 26, 2028" (DOJ Interim Final Rule, Federal Register, and ada.gov, first steps).

Two things did not change. The rule still adopts WCAG 2.1 Level AA as its technical standard, so it remains the first formal federal web accessibility benchmark in the US and the one a court has to hand when a judge asks what a website should look like. And the extension applies to Title II only: it does not touch Title III, which is where private businesses are sued. If you are a private-sector defendant, nothing about your exposure moved by a day.

What the extension really buys is time for public entities, and a longer runway for agencies serving them. It is not a signal that federal enforcement is softening.

Why does this matter for private businesses? Because it solidifies WCAG 2.1 Level AA as the benchmark courts reference. When a judge asks "what should this website look like?" the answer is now much clearer. That clarity makes it easier for plaintiffs to argue their case against any business, not just government entities.

It also means a fresh wave of litigation against government websites. More lawsuits means more media coverage. More media coverage means more awareness. More awareness means more people checking their rights. It's a cycle that feeds itself.

Accessibility overlays won't save you

Some businesses think they can drop an overlay widget on their site and call it compliant. The data says otherwise.

EcomBack counted 983 ADA website accessibility lawsuits in 2025 against sites that already had an accessibility widget, out of 3,948 filed, which is 24.90% of the year, up from 722 cases (22.65%) in 2024 (EcomBack, 2025 annual report). Roughly a quarter of defendants had already paid for a product they believed protected them.

In April 2025 the Federal Trade Commission approved a final order requiring accessiBe to pay $1 million, and barred the company from claiming its automated product makes a website WCAG compliant (FTC press release).

Overlays don't fix your code. They add a layer on top of broken HTML and hope for the best. Courts aren't buying it. Plaintiff's lawyers specifically look for overlay widgets because they signal a business that knows it has a problem but took the cheapest possible shortcut. It's like putting a fresh coat of paint on a house with a cracked foundation and hoping the building inspector won't notice.

New York is still ground zero, but the lawsuits are spreading

New York federal courts handled 1,021 website accessibility lawsuits in 2025 alone. Florida and California round out the top three. Together, these three states account for over 74% of all federal filings.

But the geography is expanding fast. Illinois jumped to 237 lawsuits in just the first half of 2025 - nearly 12% of total filings. Missouri and Minnesota are seeing increased activity. New plaintiff's attorneys are setting up shop in states that were previously quiet.

There's another wrinkle. Many plaintiffs have started filing in state courts instead of federal courts, especially in New York and New Jersey. Those state court filings aren't counted in the federal numbers. The actual total number of lawsuits is significantly higher than 3,117.

And filed complaints are not the whole picture either. Demand letters are settled privately and never reach a docket, so no public count of them exists. That cuts both ways: nobody can tell you how many there are, including anyone who quotes you a number.

The DOJ is watching settlements more closely

Here's a recent development that changes the game. In February 2026, the Department of Justice filed a Statement of Interest opposing a proposed class action settlement involving Fashion Nova's website accessibility. The DOJ argued the settlement didn't meaningfully improve accessibility and the monetary payments disproportionately favored the attorneys over the class members.

The DOJ even pointed out that the settlement administrator's website - the very site blind people had to use to submit claims - wasn't accessible to screen readers. You can't make this up.

This signals something important. Quick, cheap settlements that don't actually fix the underlying problems won't fly anymore. The DOJ is specifically calling out plaintiff's attorneys who file hundreds of near-identical lawsuits and pocket the fees without driving real change. If your site gets sued, the path to resolution now requires actual remediation, not just writing a check.

What this means for your business

If you've read this far, you're probably wondering whether your website is at risk. Here's the straightforward answer: if you haven't had a proper accessibility scan, it almost certainly is. 94.8% of websites fail basic accessibility checks.

The businesses that avoid lawsuits share one trait. They don't wait for a demand letter to show up. They scan regularly, fix the high-risk issues first, and document their efforts. That documentation matters - it shows good faith if a plaintiff ever does come knocking.

Here's what to prioritize:

Missing alt text on images. This is the number one issue cited in lawsuits. Every meaningful image on your site needs a description that a screen reader can announce. Product images, banners, icons - all of them.

Broken keyboard navigation. If someone can't tab through your site and use every element without a mouse, you're exposed. Dropdown menus, modal popups, and shopping cart flows are the most common failure points.

Poor color contrast. Text without enough contrast against its background gets flagged constantly. It's also one of the easiest things to fix.

Missing form labels. If your checkout form or search bar doesn't have proper labels, screen reader users can't complete purchases. For e-commerce sites, an inaccessible checkout is a lawsuit waiting to happen.

Where 2026 is heading

Midway through 2026 the trend has not turned. UsableNet, which counts federal and state filings covering websites and mobile apps, projects "approximately 6,176 lawsuits for 2026" and describes that as "a nearly 20% increase over 2025" (UsableNet, 2026 midyear report). That is a projection from a half-year pace rather than a count, and it counts a wider set of cases than the Seyfarth federal website figure above, so read it as direction rather than a total.

Don't wait for the demand letter

Accessibility lawsuits jumped 27% last year. AI is making them cheaper to file. The EU is actively enforcing new regulations. Overlay widgets are being exposed as compliance theater. And the DOJ is raising the bar on what counts as a real fix.

Every trend points in one direction: more lawsuits, targeting more businesses, in more places.

A scan takes 60 seconds. A lawsuit takes months and costs $25,000 or more to settle. The math is not complicated.

Scan your website for free and find out where you stand before someone else finds out for you.